Libertarianism is NOT Enough: A Reply

Rethinking the Role of Culture in Libertarianism

In a recent article by J.W. Rich, the importance of integrating cultural elements into the libertarian movement is explored, highlighting the need for a multi-faceted approach to achieving libertarian goals. While the author presents compelling arguments regarding the benefits of incorporating cultural components into political strategies, a closer examination reveals potential flaws in the framing of the argument.

The article begins by acknowledging the limitations of a purely political strategy in advancing libertarian ideals, recognizing the need for broader cultural engagement. It rightly points out that a cultural element can provide additional points of entry into the movement and help sustain momentum over time. However, the author's implicit assertion that the libertarian movement should serve as the primary entity, with culture acting as a supplement, warrants scrutiny.

At the heart of the issue lies in discerning the essence of libertarianism and understanding its relationship with culture. Libertarianism, at its core, can be perceived as a tool encompassing a political analysis of the state and a legal theory aimed at guiding decision-making within legal systems. In essence, libertarianism, when stripped down to its most fundamental (and most defensible) form, is rather thin and serves primarily as a framework for evaluating governmental authority and legal principles.¹  Asking libertarianism to 1) win the hearts and minds of people and 2) call them to action, mistakes Libertarianism for something it’s not.

The author's suggestion that culture should be leveraged to enhance the political progress of the libertarian movement raises several critical considerations. While this strategy may initially appear pragmatic, it fails to fully appreciate the profound influence that culture exerts on societal attitudes and beliefs. Culture is not merely a tool to be wielded in service of political objectives but is instead a dynamic and multifaceted phenomenon that shapes the very fabric of society.

By emphasizing the instrumental role of culture in advancing the libertarian agenda, there is a risk of overlooking the intrinsic connection between cultural values and political ideologies. Attempting to harness culture solely as a means to an end runs the risk of reducing its complexity and richness, potentially undermining the authenticity and effectiveness of the libertarian message. However, if a cultural movement is informed and influenced by libertarianism, this risk is mitigated. When libertarianism is seen as an attribute of a broader worldview or movement, it becomes integrated into the cultural fabric in an authentic manner. By recognizing the reciprocal relationship between culture and libertarianism, where cultural values both inform and are informed by libertarian ideals, we ensure that the expression of libertarian principles through cultural avenues remains genuine and resonant. In this way, libertarianism becomes not just a political agenda but an integral aspect of a broader cultural narrative, enriching and strengthening both the libertarian message and the cultural landscape as a whole.

For example, consider Christianity, which has exerted a profound influence on the Western world for over two millennia. Within Christianity, there exists a robust worldview that shapes not only individual beliefs but also societal norms and values. It gives a reason for people to be a community, to act. In this context, libertarianism can serve as a valuable tool for informing Christians who seek to promote a more Christian-centric society.

By incorporating libertarian principles into their worldview, Christians can gain insights into the potential pitfalls of excessive state intervention and the dangers of conflating religious faith with political power. Libertarianism can offer a critical perspective on the corrupting influence of state authority, helping Christians to navigate the complexities of governance without succumbing to the temptation of establishing a theocracy or embracing a form of Christian nationalism.

It is important to note that within this framework, libertarianism assumes a secondary role, complementing and enhancing the primary influence of Christianity. Rather than seeking to supplant or overshadow religious beliefs, libertarianism is recognized for what it is: a valuable tool that can help Christians navigate the complexities of political and social life while remaining true to their faith. In this way, libertarianism serves as a means of enriching and reinforcing the broader cultural narrative of Christianity, safeguarding against potential distortions or abuses of religious authority in the realm of governance.

In essence, a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between libertarianism and culture is essential. Rather than viewing culture as a mere tool for advancing political objectives, it should be recognized as a dynamic and influential force that both informs and is informed by libertarian ideals. By embracing the complexity and interdependence of culture and libertarianism, we can develop more holistic and effective strategies for advancing the principles of individual freedom and limited government.

By adopting a cultural-first approach, we acknowledge that meaningful progress begins with a transformation of hearts and minds. Rather than seeking to impose libertarian ideals through political maneuvering, we should focus on cultivating a cultural environment that values freedom, individualism, and voluntary cooperation. In doing so, the libertarian movement becomes a natural outgrowth of broader cultural shifts rather than an independent entity vying for political dominance.

1. The thinness of libertarianism becomes evident when considering the absence of intrinsic reasons for libertarians to engage in communal activities beyond occasional gatherings such as book clubs or political speeches. Unlike certain ideologies or belief systems that foster tight-knit communities based on shared cultural, religious, or philosophical values, libertarianism lacks a compelling rationale for sustained social interaction among its adherents. While libertarians may come together sporadically to discuss political theory or advocate for specific policies, there is typically no inherent motivation for ongoing community involvement or mutual support beyond matters of self-defense or immediate political action. This observation underscores the minimalistic nature of libertarian ideology and highlights the importance of fostering constructive, positive endeavors that go beyond mere opposition to government intervention. Indeed, for a movement to thrive, it must offer its members not only something to fight against but also something meaningful to build together.